Efficacy of Human chorion membrane compared to Human amnion membrane compared to Bactigras as a Surgical Dressing material in facial abrasions - An In Vivo Comparative Study.

Efficacy of Human chorion membrane vs Human amnion membrane vs Bactigras as a Surgical Dressing material in facial abrasions - An In Vivo Comparative Study. - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/07/113952

Enrollment

Registered

2026-07-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: V274- Motorcycle driver injured in collision with fixed or stationary object in traffic accident

Interventions

Intervention1: Human chorionic membrane: The healing will be checked on day 7, day 14 and day 21 using Vancouver scar scale , Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. Intervention2: Human amniotic membrane

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients willing to participate in the study and treatment. 2. Patient presenting with facial abrasions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients unwilling to participate in the study or treatment. 2. Patients below the age of 18 years. 3. Patients above the age of 45 years 4. Medically compromised patients. 5.Pre-existing dermatological conditions or infections affecting facial skin healing.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Wound healing and scar quality will be checked using Vancouver scar scale and Bates Jensen wound assessment Tool.Timepoint: Day 1, 7 , 21	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRao Vaishnavi Reddy

Dr. D Y Patil Dental College and Hospital , Pimpri pune

bm.rudagi@dpu.edu.in9673494111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026