FindTrial
Sign In

Comparision of retention of upper complete dentures made from two different impression materials

The effect of zinc oxide eugenol and polyvinylsiloxane impression materials on the retention of maxillary complete denture bases: An -vivo comparative study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/113818
Enrollment
46
Registered
2026-07-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Maxillary complete denture base made from the impression using light body polyvinylsiloxane: The denture base made from the impression using light body polyvinylsiloxane impression past

Sponsors

Nodal Officer Multi Disciplinary Research Unit, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of 40 years and above seeking prosthetic rehabilitation who have a completely edentulous maxilla

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients not willing to participate, patients with the presence of bony tori, fibrous ridge, tissue undercuts and ridge resorption.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Use of light body polyvinylsiloxane impression material may provide more retention of the complete denture base than the denture base made by using zinc oxide eugenol impression material.Timepoint: The retentive force will be measured five minutes after complete denture base insertion.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. BABINA CHIROM

Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal

bbnacrm@gmail.com07085481670

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026