Comparative Evaluation of Different Surface Modifications of Dental Implants

Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Different Surface Modifications of Sandblasted Large Grit Acid Etched Dental Implants - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/07/113787

Enrollment

Registered

2026-07-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: UV Photofunctionalized Thermally Oxidised SLA Dental Implants: Photo activated, thermally oxidized implant will be placed in assigned site and evaluated Intervention2: UV Photofunction

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients without any debilitating illness or medical history 2. Patients with completely or partially edentulous mandibular arches requiring a minimum of four implants 3. Presence or absence of natural teeth or prosthetic rehabilitation in the opposite side of the edentulous area to provide occlusal contact with the prosthetic units on the implants in the mandible 4. Adequate oral hygiene 5. Surgical sites with similar bone density 6. Surgical sites with similar dimensions of the alveolar bone 7. No bony pathology at the area of implant site or adjacent teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with any systemic condition which prevents surgical intervention like uncontrolled diabetes, Hypertension, Bleeding disorder etc. and/or oral habits like smoking. 2. Pregnant females. 3. Patients with known titanium or any other treatment material related allergy. 4. Evidence of substantial abnormalities in neurological, psychiatric and any other systemic disease. 5. On systemic medication which interfere in healing e.g. Bisphosphonates 6. Patients with an advanced or unmanageable oral condition. 7. Patients with very poor oral hygiene. 8. Patients who fail to report for follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Implant Stability Timepoint: 0, 3, 6, 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Marginal bone lossTimepoint: 0, 3, 6, 12 months;Modified Gingival IndexTimepoint: 6, 12 months;Modified Plaque IndexTimepoint: 6, 12 months;Peri Implant Probing DepthTimepoint: 6, 12 months;Bleeding on ProbingTimepoint: 6,12 months;Implant Survival RateTimepoint: 6, 12 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Srawashi Misra

Banaras Hindu University

drsrawashi@gmail.com09508461162

Outcome results