comparing lignocaine and mepivacaine in tooth removal wound healing in children

Comparative evaluation of 2 percentage lignocaine with vasoconstrictor and 3 percentage mepivacaine in extraction wound healing in children: A randomized crossover clinical trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/07/113651

Enrollment

Registered

2026-07-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Lignocaine: 2% lignocaine 1:80,000 of adrenaline as an adjunct in local anesthesia for tooth extraction Control Intervention1: Mepivacaine: Mepivacaine as local anesthetic agent for

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children of 6 to 14 years with ASA Grade I status and who require multiple appointments for extraction under local anesthesia bilaterally

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children who are allergic to local anesthetic solution, medically compromised and special child

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mepivacaine when used as local anesthetic may show superior wound healing after extractionTimepoint: seven days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shrutha SP

AMEs dental college hospital and research center

shruthavinit@gmail.com09483329406

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026