FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparison of Two Retainers Used to Keep Lower Teeth Straight After Braces

Comparison of Clinical Efficiency of Esthetic Fibre-Reinforced Composite Retainer with Ortho-Flex-Tech Retainer in Mandibular arch - An In-vivo study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/113384
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-07-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring Health Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Fibre-Reinforced Composite retainer.: A retainer will be placed after debonding in the lower anterior region from canine to canine and bonded with adhesive for 6 months. Control Interve

Sponsors

Dr Bhawana Dajjuka
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with 0.1-0.9 Plaque Index and 0.3- 0.9 Gingival Index. Orthodontically treated patients. Angle s Class I Molar relationship. Overbite/overjet between 1-3 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with caries, restoration, fracture or missing lower anterior teeth. Periodontally compromised patients. Advanced dental abrasion, attrition, erosion and bruxism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess and compare the efficiency of fiber reinforced and ortho-flex tech retainersTimepoint: 3 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess gingival health in each retainer & the level of patient satisfaction about esthetic results.Timepoint: 3 month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shaheen Hamdani

rungta college of dental sciences and research

hamdanishaheen@gmail.com9993084442

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026