Skip to content

Comparison of two tooth pulp capping materials to evaluate formation of a protective barrier in teeth with deep cavities an invivo cbct study

Comparative Evaluation Of Two Pulp Capping Materials On Dentin Bridge Formation Following Indirect Pulp Capping An Invivo Cbct Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/113276
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-07-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Ceramir protect LC: Light cured resin modified bioceramic pulp protectant for indirect pulp capping Control Intervention1: Theracal LC: Light cured resin modified calcium silicate fille

Sponsors

TAMANAMPUDI LAKSHMI MANJUSHA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged between 18-35 years old Teeth with active deep caries on the occlusal or promixal surfaces Dull, reversible pain,mild discomfort on chewing on radiographic examination caries should be greater than two-third of dentin thickness towards pulp no radiolucency in the periapical or furcation area

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with periodontal lesions pathologic mobility discoloration internal and external resorption acute and chornic systemic conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cone Beam Computed tomographyTimepoint: Base line , 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Dentin bridge formationTimepoint: Base line, 8 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr J Ravi Kumar

Drs Sudha and Nageswara rao siddhartha institute of dental sciences

drkumarjanga@gmail.com9440250244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026