Skip to content

Comparison of Three Treatment Methods for Reducing Dark Gum Pigmentation: Vitamin C, Diode Laser, and Surgery

Comparative evaluation of Vitamin C Mesotherapy, Diode Laser (980nm) and Conventional surgery in the treatment of Physiologic Gingival Hyperpigmentation- Clinical and Histological study- A Double-blind Non-Randomized Controlled trial. - DEPIG-3 Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/113262
Enrollment
14
Registered
2026-07-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: vitamin c laser scalpel: Vit C is used for gingival hyperpigmentation by mesotherapy, laser is used for gingival hyperpigmentation by absorption of wavelength by melanin, scalpel scrape

Sponsors

Dr Prarthana Mantri
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diffuse continuous physiological pigmentation of the gingiva involving the facial aspect of teeth classified under Dummet Oral Pigmentation Index minimum score 2. Systemically and periodontally healthy male and female with an age range of 18-40 years. Patient with esthetic concern due to gingival hyperpigmentation. Patients with good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients suffering from any known systemic diseases. Individuals with a habit of smoking tobacco chewing. Patients with drugs intake such as antimalarial drugs phenothiazine oral contraceptives. Pregnant and lactating mothers. Patients with periodontal disease. Patients with known hypersentivity to ascorbic acid. Patient undergone gingival depigmentation within last 1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare efficacy of vitamin c mesotherapy and diode laser and conventional surgical technique in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation by change in clinical and histological parametersTimepoint: At baseline,1 week,4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
compare the efficacy between three different techniquesTimepoint: 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Prarthana Mantri

DR HSRSM DENTAL COLLEGE, HINGOLI-431513

mantriprarthana@gmail.com8605545928

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026