Skip to content

Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques in cleaning infected primary teeth

Antimicrobial efficacy of different irrigation activation techniques in primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/113104
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-06-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K041- Necrosis of pulp

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation (UAI): Root canal irrigation using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA activated with an ultrasonic tip placed 1 mm short of working length during pul

Sponsors

Dr Hansika Rastogi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children requiring pulpectomy in primary molars Primary molars with necrotic pulp or irreversible pulpitis Teeth with restorable crown structure Teeth with no more than one-third physiological root resorption Absence of pathological root resorption Cooperative children Parents/guardians willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with systemic diseases or immunocompromised conditions Teeth with excessive root resorption Presence of internal or external pathological resorption Teeth with root fractures or perforations Previously endodontically treated teeth Children who have received antibiotics within past 2 4 weeks Uncooperative children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage reduction in colony forming units (CFU/ml) of intracanal microbiota after different irrigation activation techniquesTimepoint: Baseline and at 1 month post-intervention in all three study groups (Conventional Needle Irrigation, Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation, and Laser Activated Irrigation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of antimicrobial reduction among conventional needle irrigation, ultrasonic activated irrigation & laser activated irrigation.Timepoint: Intergroup comparison at the end of the primary outcome assessment period (1 month post-intervention).

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Hansika Rastogi

Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre

chaitumbd@gmail.com9634453045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026