Skip to content

Periotome-Assisted Versus Conventional Forceps Extraction of First Premolars in Orthodontic Patients: A Comparative Study

A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Periotome Assisted Extraction and Conventional Forceps Extraction of Maxillary First Premolars in Orthodontic Patients - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/113000
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-06-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M264- Malocclusion, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: PERIOTOME: PERIOTOME ASSISTED EXTRACTION OF FIRST PREMOLARS IN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS Control Intervention1: CONVENTIONAL FORCEPS: CONVENTIONAL FORCEPS EXTRACTION OF FIRST PREMOLARS IN

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Patients indicated for bilateral orthodontic teeth extraction 2)Healthy periodontium. 3) Patients between 10-30 years of age.. 4)Patients with ASA Grade I status.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with systemic diseases such as HTN, DM, blood dyscrasias, immuno-compromised status. 2) Patients with poor oral hygiene and chronic smokers and chronic alcoholism. 3) Pregnant or nursing women. 4) Associated pathology like cyst and tumour and localized infection. 5) Grossly Decayed , dilacerated roots. Root Canal treated teeth 6) Patients lost to follow-up. 7) Patients with ASA Grade II , III, IV status.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduced operative trauma Improved postoperative comfort Enhanced healing Better preservation of extraction socket integrity Improved hemostatic outcome Clinical efficiencyTimepoint: Reduced operative trauma Improved postoperative comfort Enhanced healing Better preservation of extraction socket integrity Improved hemostatic outcome Clinical efficiency

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAshwini Andhale

Sharad Pawar Dental college and Hospital

nitin.bhola@dmiher.edu.in9970070607

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026