Comparing two different airway devices which are used to provide anaesthesia for laparoscopic gall bladder removal

Comparison of i-gel Plus and i-gel as airway device in adult patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised comparative study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/06/112810

Enrollment

132

Registered

2026-06-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: igel Plus: after induction of anaesthesia, appropriate size i-gel Plus will be inserted based on the manufacturers recommendation. insertion characteristics will be compared. thereafter

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I & II , undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Comparing the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the i-gel and i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesiaTimepoint: from the time of placement of airway device till the end of surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Insertion characteristics of the device (number of insertion attempts, mean time of insertion, ease of insertion, success rate, oropharyngeal leak pressure) 2. Ease gastric tube insertion, 1st attempt success rate of gastric tube insertion 3. Surgeons grading of stomach deflation (completely deflated; partially inflated but not hindering surgery; distended and hinderance in surgery) 4. Any complication during the procedure Timepoint: from the start of surgery till dischrge from PACU	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Insertion characteristics of the device (number of insertion attempts, mean time of insertion, ease of insertion, success rate, oropharyngeal leak pressure) 2. Ease gastric tube insertion, 1st attempt success rate of gastric tube insertion 3. Surgeons grading of stomach deflation (completely deflated; partially inflated but not hindering surgery; distended and hinderance in surgery) 4. Any complication during the procedure Timepoint: from the start of surgery till dischrge from PACU

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nitin Choudhary

AIIMS, Delhi

drnitinchoudhary@yahoo.in08447698566

Outcome results