FindTrial
Sign In

A clinical trial to study the comparison between two common anesthesia technique in terms of Nerve monitoring for Spine Surgery Patients

Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Inhalational Anesthesia on Neuromonitoring in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Spine Surgery: Randomized controlled trials - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112727
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-06-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G543- Thoracic root disorders, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia: Maintenance of anesthesia using propofol infusion with opioid supplementation as per study protocol during spine surgery requiring intraoperative

Sponsors

AIIMS Rishikesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.All patients planned for intraoperative neuromonitoring in elective spine surgery 2.American society of anesthesiologists physical class I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known allergies to Propofol and sevoflurane 2. Patient with cardiovascular disease 3. Patient with pre-existing neurological deficits, neuromuscular disorders, epilepsy 4. Patient refused to give consent for Procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring parameters ( Motor Evoked Potentials)Timepoint: Every 30 mins after positioning and induction until completion of surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Hemodynamics stability 2. Immediate postanesthesia recoveryTimepoint: 2 hours after surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR AARAPI BHUSAL

AIIMS, Rishikesh

Drankit80@gmail.com09761966555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026