FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Dynamic and Static Neck Exercises for Reducing Pain and Improving Neck Function in People with Cervical Spondylosis

To Compare the Effectiveness of Isometric Neck Exercises along with Conventional Physiotherapy Versus Dynamic Neck Exercises along with Conventional Physiotherapy on the Pain, Function, and Quality of Life In the Case of Cervical Spondylosis - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112642
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-06-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M478- Other spondylosis

Interventions

Intervention1: Isometric Neck Exercises along with Conventional Physiotherapy: Isometric neck exercises were given to the patients of Group A for 6 days a week for 3 weeks under the supervision of Phy

Sponsors

Pranati Sharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primary complaint of neck pain with no radiculopathy. Chronic stage neck pain (above 3 months). Patients with a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score above 15/50 Patient with neck stiffness The diagnosis of cervical spondylosis will be made by an orthopedics & neurologists.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute pain & inflammation. Acute inflammatory arthritis. Congenital malformation of the spine, e.g., Torticollis. History of trauma and fracture of the cervical spine. History of vertigo. History of neck surgery over the past year. Those who had not been receiving exercise therapy or physiotherapy during the 6 weeks before the study will be included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Improvement in functional disability measured by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Improvement in quality of life in subjects with cervical spondylosisTimepoint: Baseline (Pre-treatment), End of 2nd week, End of 3rd week post intervention—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical Range of Motion (ROM)Timepoint: Baseline and end of 3rd week;Muscle strength/enduranceTimepoint: Baseline and end of 3rd week;Patient satisfactionTimepoint: End of 3rd week—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Hemendra Kumar Sharma

Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Physiotherapy College

hemendra.physio@gmail.com9460888177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026