Skip to content

Comparsion of hearing improvement after ear surgery using a drill versus a laser

Post operative hearing outcomes and complications in Skeeter drill Vs CO2 laser assisted stapedotomy:A randomised control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112510
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-06-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H743- Other acquired abnormalities of ear ossicles Health Condition 2: H743- Other acquired abnormalities of ear ossicles

Interventions

Intervention1: LASER ASISTED STAPEDOTOMY: TO MAKE FENESTRA IN STAPES FOOTPLATE USING LASER Control Intervention1: SKEETER ASSITED STAPEDOTOMY: TO MAKE FENESTRA IN STAPES FOOTPLATE USING SKEETER DRILL

Sponsors

DEPARTMENT OF ENT
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Intact tympanic membrane Conductive or mixed hearing loss with Air bone gap more than 20 dB Consent for surgery and follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pure sensorineural hearing loss Perforated tympanic membrane Prior ear surgery Age less than 18 or more than 60 Active ear infection or systemic contraindications Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complication rates (vertigo, pain, nerve injury, taste changes, persistent Conductive hearing loss , perforation of tympanic membrane )Timepoint: FOLLOW UP AFTER 1 AND 2 MONTHS

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Closure of air bone gapTimepoint: day 30, day 60

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr VIKASDEEP GUPTA

AIIMS BATHINDA

ent.aiimsbathinda@gmail.com9882748648

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026