FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between interventions like bilateral arm exercises with and without rhythmic auditory cues for improving arm function after stroke participants

Effectiveness of bilateral arm training with and without rhythmic auditory cueing on functional mobility of upper limb in stroke survivors - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112493
Enrollment
28
Registered
2026-06-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G811- Spastic hemiplegia

Interventions

Intervention1: Bilateral arm training: Participants will receive a structured bilateral arm training program comprising task-oriented bilateral upper limb activities, including reaching, object manipu

Sponsors

Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: MMSE greater than 24 Time since stroke greater or equal to 3 months with brunnstrom stage greater or equal to 3 Subjects must have some voluntary movement in affected arm MCA infract including both dominant and non-dominant side Individuals having Fugl-Meyer arm section scale score between 23-47 Subjects must be able to sit unsupported for at least 30 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe cognitive impairments Visual or auditory impairments Severe spasticity(MAS greater than 2) Apraxia Presence of other musculoskeletal or neurological condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 Fugl-Meyer Scale (arm component) 2 Action Research Arm Test Timepoint: Day 1, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suraj Kanase
deanphysiotherapy@kvv.edu.in09881577676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026