Skip to content

Accuracy of an Indigenous Spine Navigation System Compared with the Medtronic StealthStation S8 and O-arm Imaging: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial

The Accuracy of an Indigenous Navigation System for Spine Surgery compared to Medtronic StealthStation S8 with O-Arm Surgical Imaging System: Equivalence single centric, Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112439
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M95-M95- Other disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: Indigenous Spine Navigation System (Generic name: Computer Assisted Surgery System): A novel, indigenously developed optical navigation platform designed for spine surgery, utilizing re

Sponsors

Ganga Medical AI Private Limited
Lead Sponsor
Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre IIT Madras
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Subject is Diagnosed with required disease /symptoms with requirement of surgical intervention when able to rigidly attach reference markers, and stereotactic surgery may be possible 2.Female patient in childbearing age has a negative urine pregnancy test on the day of the procedure 3.The subject (or a legally authorized representative) has provided written informed consent for study participation and procedures to be performed. 4.Signed written declaration of consent after oral and written explanation. 5.Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Inability to obtain an informed consent from the subject (or a legally authorized representative) 2.Pregnant or breastfeeding women 3.Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant s ability to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome was the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, defined as the proportion of screws achieving Grade A or B on the Gertzbein Robbins classification on postoperative CT imaging.Timepoint: Postoperative day 1 or when feasible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Deviation from planned trajectory, measured as linear deviation (mm) from the intended entry point. Angular deviation (degrees) from the planned screw trajectory. Proportion of Grade A screws on the Gertzbein Robbins classification. Cortical breach rate and direction (medial, lateral, superior, inferior). Number of insertion attempts and first-pass success rate. Procedure-related metrics, including time for screw placement (system setup to final placement), total operative time (skin-to-skin), and intraoperative blood loss. Complications, including neurological, hardware-related, or other perioperative adverse events. Radiation exposure (if recorded). System usability, assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).Timepoint: Intraoperative time and Postoperative CT on day 1 or when feasible.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGnanaprakash Gurusamy

Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital

gnana395@gmail.com8668173135

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026