Skip to content

Comparison of Different Methods for Human Tooth Shade Selection Using AI apps, Intraoral Scanner, and Visual Shade Guide: An In Vivo Study

Comparative Evaluation of Tooth Shade Selection Using Artificial Intelligence Applications, Intraoral Scanner Software, And Conventional Visual Method with the VITA Classical Shade Guide: An In Vivo Study - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112403
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: AI app: Chat GPT Gemini Claude Intervention2: Intraoral Scanner: 3Shape TRIOS Control Intervention1: Visual Tooth Shade Guide: Classic VITA tooth shade guide

Sponsors

Dr Siddharth Kankariya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with presence of complete and partial permanent teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The Patient refused the proposed treatment and unwilling to sign the informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
AI is better compared to human as well as intraoral scanner.Timepoint: one day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jagadeesh H G

College Of Dental Science,Amargadh

bathijaggu@gmail.com8448447816

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026