Skip to content

A Study Comparing Two Surgical Methods for Improving the Appearance of Facial Scars

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing W-Plasty and Fusiform Elliptical Excision for Facial Scar Revision - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112401
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L768- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications of skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: fusiform excision: Participants will undergo facial scar revision using the fusiform excision technique under local anaesthesia. The intervention consists of a single surgical procedure

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either sex aged 18 60 years with mature facial scars (scar age more or equal to 6 months) requiring elective surgical scar revision, who are medically fit for surgery, willing to participate in the study, and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients younger than 18 or older than 60 years, those with immature scars (less than 6 months), active local infection or ulceration at the scar site, history of keloid or hypertrophic scar tendency, uncontrolled systemic illness affecting wound healing (such as uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised states, collagen vascular disorders), previous scar revision at the same site, pregnancy, or inability/unwillingness to comply with follow-up or provide consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This study is expected to provide a clinical comparison between two established methods of scar revision. Results may guide the selection of technique based on location, scar characteristics, and patient preference. The findings will also add to the literature supporting technique-specific outcomes in facial scar revision.Timepoint: 1. Recruitment Phase: 4-6 months 2. Surgical Phase: 14-16 months 3. Data Analysis and Reporting: 2-3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess patient-reported satisfaction scores using validated subjective scar assessment toolsTimepoint: Baseline (Pre-operative) Post-operative Day 7 (for early complications) Post-operative Day 30 Post-operative Day 90 Post-operative Day 180;2. To compare the postoperative complication rates (e.g., infection, dehiscence, hypertrophy) between both surgical techniques.Timepoint: ;3. To evaluate and compare the healing duration, scar behavior, and maturation timeline post-surgery up to 6 months.Timepoint: ;4. To conduct a surgeon-centered operative efficiency analysis, including- Intraoperative time taken Design and closure difficulty Timepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSTHITAPRAJNA LENKA

siksha o anusandhan

sthitaprajnalenka@soa.ac.in9337555777

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026