FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between Zirconia, Bioflx and Strip crowns in front teeth of children.

Comparative Evaluation of Zirconia, Bioflx and strip crowns in primary anterior teeth over a period of time: an In Vivo study - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/112027
Enrollment
75
Registered
2026-06-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K049- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues Health Condition 2: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Zirconia crowns: To check aesthetics and retention of preformed Zirconia crowns. For the Duration of 2 years Control Intervention1: Anterior Strip crowns: Strip crowns placed on the ant

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Presence of equivalent or more than one third of crown structure. Abscence of physiological pathological root resorption upto Two third or more of root length.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Grossly decayed teeth with less than one third of tooth structure remaining. Teeth demonstrating poor prognosis, such as external root resorption or internal resorption. Impinging deep overbite. Periodontal disease. Parafunctional habits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Esthetic outcome assessed by parent and child satisfaction regarding dental appearance using a structured questionnaire.Timepoint: Period of 2 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactUniver Jit Kaur

Punjab government Dental college and Hospital

drnirap@gmail.com9814815177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026