FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols versus conventional perioperative care in improving postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing elective hepatobiliary surgeries.

Comparative Study Between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Conventional Perioperative Care in Elective Hepatobiliary Surgeries : A One-Year Prospective Observational Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/111913
Enrollment
76
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Kartik Kapil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient presenting with pathology related to liver, biliary systems or a combination of these problem either malignant or benign disease ASA Grade I II or III Patients who are able to understand and follow the necessities of the program and to offer a consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency Surgery ASA Grade IV Age less than 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Length of hospital stay 2. Time to oral intake 3. Time to first flatus/bowel movement.Timepoint: To measure all these outcomes from day of surgery till day of discharge i.e. at the baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time to mobilization 2. Postoperative pain scoreTimepoint: To measure all these outcomes from day of surgery till day of discharge i.e. at the baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKartik Kapil

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Belagavi

drrameshkoujalagi@gmail.com9448875200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026