Skip to content

Comparison of implant stability in immediate and delayed dental implant

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STABILITY TRANSITION FROM MECHANICAL TO BIOLOGICAL PHASE IN IMMEDIATE VERSUS DELAYED DENTAL IMPLANTS USING RFA (Radio Frequency Analysis)DEVICE A CLINICAL STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/111836
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-06-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: F- Physical Rehabilitation and Diagnostic Audiology

Interventions

Intervention1: RFA Device: Measurement of implant stability at the time of placement, at 2-3 months and at 6 months in delayed implant Control Intervention1: RFA Device: Measurement of implant stabili

Sponsors

Dr RAHUL CHOUDHURY
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Single or multiple tooth replacement case Adequate bone volume Systemically healthy patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients History of radiotherapy in head and neck region Active infection at implant site Heavy smokers Pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Implant stability evaluation of both immediate and delayed implant at the time of placementTimepoint: 0 days ( immediately after implant placement)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Implant stability evaluation of both immediate and delayed implantTimepoint: 2-3 months and 4-6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SANYOG PATHAK

HITKARINI DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, JABALPUR

pathak_sanyog@yahoo.com9755645054

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026