Which Works Better for Repairing Bone Damage Around Teeth: Minimally Invasive Gum Surgery With or Without Bone Graft?

Comparative evaluation of modified minimally invasive surgical technique with or without a moldable bone graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: A randomized clinical trail. - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/06/111580

Enrollment

Registered

2026-06-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified minimally invasive surgical technique with a moldable bone graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: The intrabony defects will be treated using the Modified Min

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged above 18 years with at least two comparable intrabony periodontal defects in contralateral quadrants suitable for a split-mouth design. Defect sites were required to have a probing pocket depth (PPD) of greater than equal to 5 mm and radiographic evidence of intrabony defect depth greater than equal to 3 mm, associated with vital teeth. Only systemically healthy patients with no contraindications to periodontal surgery, who had completed Phase I periodontal therapy with satisfactory oral hygiene maintenance, and were willing to undergo surgical treatment and provide written informed consent were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria included patients with systemic conditions affecting periodontal wound healing, smokers and users of smokeless tobacco, pregnant or lactating women, teeth with furcation involvement or Grade III mobility, patients on long-term medications affecting bone metabolism, and sites with acute periodontal or periapical infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
This study will help us to assess the radiographic bone fill in intrabony periodontal defects treated using the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with a moldable bone graft at 6 months.Timepoint: baseline and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
This study will help us to assess the clinical attachment level (CAL) gain in intrabony periodontal defects treated using the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with & without a moldable bone graft at 6 months.This study will help us to assess the probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction in intrabony periodontal defects.This study will help us to assess the change in gingival margin position (defect stability) in intrabony periodontal defects.Timepoint: 6 months	—

Measure

Time frame

This study will help us to assess the clinical attachment level (CAL) gain in intrabony periodontal defects treated using the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with & without a moldable bone graft at 6 months.This study will help us to assess the probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction in intrabony periodontal defects.This study will help us to assess the change in gingival margin position (defect stability) in intrabony periodontal defects.Timepoint: 6 months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPranav Sanjay Aher

Goverment Dental College Raipur

vinleo76@gmail.com9977333345

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026