Comparing a custom guide tool against the simple hand method for placing dental implants

Precision of implant placement with implant positional guide versus freehand technique a comparative analysis - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/06/111528

Enrollment

Registered

2026-06-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Implant Positional Guide: Surgical placement of dental implants using a patient specific stereolithographic positioning guide A preoperative cone beam computed tomography scan and digit

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Patients with missing, or decayed teeth who require implant restoration without bone augmentation. 2 Good oral hygiene 3 No other medical condition. 4 No presence of acute infection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients with an opening of fewer than 30mm, which is not conducive to the placement of a guide 2 Patients with missing teeth at the free end.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessment of implant placement precision by measuring the positional deviation between the virtually planned implant position and the actual achieved clinical implant positionTimepoint: Immediately postoperatively within 1 week after the surgical procedure	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRohit Mishra

Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital Jabalpur

asranisumit@gmail.com9755645054

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026