FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Two Interactive Teaching Methods for Improving Knowledge on Childhood Immunisation and Nutrition among Medical Students

Effectiveness of Jigsaw versus small group discussion on knowledge levels of immunisation and nutrition among phase 3 part 1 MBBS students of Pediatrics department

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/06/111513
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-06-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: jigsaw: A type of small group teaching learning method Control Intervention1: SGD: Conventional Teaching learning method- small group discussion

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Students who provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students who won t be able to complete the sessions & assessments conducting as part of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
gain in knowledge by assessing pretest post test score difference of Jigsaw and small group discussion learning for immunisation and nutritionTimepoint: Before and after one and half hour session conducting pre and post test and at 3 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess student s perception for Jigsaw and small group discussion 2.To compare retention test scores at 3 weeks of Jigsaw and small group discussion learning for immunisation and nutrition 3.To assess the perception of faculties regarding feasibility and student engagement Timepoint: After session,3 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Veena Anand

Medical Education- GMC TVM

drveenaped@gmail.com09447733969

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026