FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Carbon Peel with PicoWay Laser versus PicoWay Laser Alone for Skin Improvement: A Split-Face Interventional Study

Prospective Interventional Split-Face Study Comparing the Efficiency of Carbon Peel with Picoway Laser versus Picoway laser Alone Using Objective Skin Parameter Assessments - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/111370
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L814- Other melanin hyperpigmentation

Interventions

Intervention1: Carbon peel + Picoway laser : Single treatment session, One side of the face to receive carbon peel + Picoway laser Control Intervention1: Picoway laser only (without carbon peel) :

Sponsors

RENDER SKIN AND HAIR
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Fitzpatrick skin types III to V Seeking cosmetic treatment for enlarged pores, uneven pigmentation, or rough texture Willing to avoid other facial cosmetic procedures during study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Active dermatitis, infection, or inflammatory skin disease on face Systemic retinoid use within 6 months Known photosensitivity disorders Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in L value, melanin index, erythema index, and gloss on both sides at Day 7Timepoint: Baseline, 1 hour, 24 hours, Day 7—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr B Ragavi

RENDER SKIN AND HAIR

drragavi@renderclinic.com7708716948

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026