FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Bone Changes After Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different Techniques in the Lower Jaw

Cone beam computed tomographic study of crestal bone loss with morphometric analysis after implant placement in mandibular posterior region using manual method and mechanized method an in vivo prospective study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/111353
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Sneha Gurav
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Missing tooth in mandibular posterior region of jaw Age ,20-60 yrs Patient with good oral hygiene Adequate bone volume D2/D3 Opposed natural dentition / FPD Systemically healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Poor oral hygiene Bone diseases like osteomalacia ,pagets disease and osteoporosis(females) Parafunctional habits such as bruxism and masticatory muscle hypertrophy Bone volume -D4 Pregnant women H/O systemic disease like Uncontrolled Diabetes ,Heart Disease, Cancer etc. Recent episodes of radio or chemotherapy Patient on bisphosphonate therapy Periodontally compromised dentition Smoking ,alcohol and drug dependency Patient on anticoagulant therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
crestal bone lossTimepoint: baseline, 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
which method out of mechanized or manual causes more bone lossTimepoint: baseline, 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vishal Patil

Vasantdada patil dental college

drvishalvpatil@gmail.com9765942407

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026