Skip to content

Comparison of Two Emergency Breathing Tube Techniques for Infant Airway Management in Stationary and Moving Ambulance Conditions

Comparison of First-Pass Success Rate in Simulated Infants Emergency Airway Management Between Supraglottic Airway Device and Endotracheal Intubation in Static Versus Moving Ambulances - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/111319
Enrollment
66
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Supraglottic Airway Device using i gel size 1: Placement of i gel supraglottic airway device in infant manikin during static environment and moving ambulance simulation to assess first

Sponsors

Mr Paulson Immanuvel S
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: MSc Emergency Medical Technology students, Bachelor Emergency Medical Technology students, Emergency Medicine junior residents, and Anesthesia and Operation Theatre Technology students willing to provide informed consent and participate in the simulation based airway management study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants with any upper limb injury, musculoskeletal condition, neurological disorder, or acute illness affecting airway procedure performance will be excluded. Individuals unwilling to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First pass success rate of supraglottic airway device placement and endotracheal intubation in infant manikin during static and moving ambulance simulationTimepoint: Assessed immediately after completion of each airway management attempt during the simulation session

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of use of airway devices during static and moving ambulance conditionsTimepoint: Assessed immediately after completion of each procedure;Participant workload and perceived difficulty using NASA TLX scoringTimepoint: Assessed immediately after each simulation session;Airway management failure patterns and procedural complicationsTimepoint: Recorded during each simulation attempt;Time required for successful airway device placementTimepoint: Measured during each simulation attempt

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jayaraj Mymbilly Balakrishnan

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital MAHE Manipal

jayaraj.mb@manipal.edu9895063579

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026