Comparing a quick bedside scan with routine doctor check-up for early detection of shock in emergency patients

EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF POCUS VERSUS STANDARD CLINICAL ASSESSMENT IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF NON-TRAUMATIC SHOCK IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/05/111248

Enrollment

152

Registered

2026-05-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R579- Shock, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: POINT OF CARE ULTRASOUND USING RUSH PROTOCOL IN NON TRAUAMATIC SHOCK: POCUS will be performed within 30 minutes of presentation by a trained emergency physician using the RUSH protocol,

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Adults presenting with signs of shock evidence of hypoperfusion). 2.Suspected non-traumatic etiology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Traumatic aetiology 2.Advanced directives precluding aggressive care 3.Pregnant patients 4.Cardiac arrest on arrival 5.Refusal of consent 6.Prior interventions for shock before ED arrival

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time from triage to definitive diagnosis of shock in minutesTimepoint: primary outcome will be measured in 24 hrs	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Diagnostic accuracy (comparison with final diagnosis) 2.Time to targeted therapy initiation 3.ICU admission rate 4.Duration of ED stay 5.24-hour mortalityTimepoint: Secondary outcomes will be measured in 24 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR.A.KRISHNA SIMHA REDDY

Sri Venkateshwara institute of medical sciences,Tirupati,

aksreddy2000@gmail.com9493547659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026