FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of mnemonic-based concept mapping and concept mapping for better learning in Anatomy students.

Development and comparative academic evaluation of a standardized mnemonic concept mapping hybrid method versus concept mapping alone for enhanced learning and retention in anatomy: A pedagogical advancement study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/111225
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

J S Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.First yaer UG students willing to participate. 2.Students attending all academic sessions. 3.Students providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Students not willing to participate. 2.Students absent for any teaching or assessments. 3.Students having proir advanced understanding of selected topics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Findings from this research are intended to inform evidence-based pedagogical practices and may support the integration of structured, learner-centered institutional methods into roytine Anatomy teaching at the institutional level.Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mital Dilipbhai Kanani

J. S. Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, Nadiad, Gujarat, India

mitalkanani11@gmail.com8758072340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026