FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two methods on the storage of male gametes

Comparison of Sperm VD Based Vitrification Versus Conventional Cryopreservation in Severe Male Factor Infertility: A Prospective Sibling Oocyte Study Evaluating Fertilization, Blastocyst Formation and Laboratory Efficiency Outcomes - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/111208
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N469- Male infertility, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Methods of sperm cryopreservation: Conventional sperm cryopreservation: The sperm cells will be cryopreserved using traditional method. Intervention2: Methods of sperm cryopreservation:

Sponsors

MFC Global
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male: Severe OATS (1-5 millions/mL) Crytozoospermia or Virtual azoospermia Azoospermia requiring PESA/TESA Female: Greater than or equal to 8 mature oocytes on the day of oocyte pick up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Female: Severe female infertility such as poor ovarian reserve, severe endometriosis, adenomyosis and uterine abnormalities. AMH less than 1.2ng/mL Chromosomal abnormalities Less than 8 oocytes on the day of oocyte pick up Donor cycles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fertilization rate (2PN)Timepoint: 1 year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Blastocyst for use in percentage compare to 2PN Time to inject the first egg Embryo utilization rate Timepoint: 1 year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKrishna Chaitanya Mantravadi

Oasis Fertility Hyderabad

krishna@oasisindia.in8008812999

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026