Skip to content

There are 57 participants in this study compares two methods used to check upper front teeth in teenagers.The primary outcome is check which test is more proper and causes less pain or discomfort.

Comparative Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Pain Perception of Thermal and Electric Pulp Sensibility Tests in Maxillary Incisors of Adolescents: A Prospective In Vivo Clinical Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110933
Enrollment
57
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Electric Pulp Tester: The electric pulp tester will be used on patient and the pain perception will be checked Control Intervention1: Heat Test: The heat test will be used on patient an

Sponsors

Dr Bhumika Sahu
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinically sound crowns, no caries, fracture, restoration or discoloration. No history of trauma to maxillary anterior teeth. Individual of age group 12 to 18 years with consent. Healthy individuals with no systemic illness.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individual with systemic illness or special health care needs. Teeth with open carious exposures and clinical signs of necrosis. Individual with dental emergencies Recent use of analgesics/antibiotics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic accuracy of thermal and electric tests.Timepoint: 10 min pre treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analogue ScaleTimepoint: 10 min pre treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Lumbini Pathivada

Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research

drlumbinip@gmail.com7830008856

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026