Comparison of two types of plates used for lower jaw fracture treatment

Trapezoidal plate versus Delta Plate in the management of Subcondyle fracture of mandible - A comparative study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/05/110778

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D Trapezoidal Plate: Using a conventional retromandibular incision, the fracture site is exposed. The Langenbeck retractor, which is placed on sigmoid notch, will be used for the reduc

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Isolated Subcondylar Fracture with occlusal discrepancy. 2. Displaced and deviated (Lindhal s Classification) types of subcondylar fracture. 3. American Society of Anaesthesiologist classification (ASA) I and II patient. 4. Age of patient : more than 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Edentulous mandible fracture. 2. Pre-existing osseous pathology or history of Fracture of mandibular condyle. 3. Previous History of pathology in temporomandibular joints. 4. Condylar fracture associated with any other mid-face fracture or having additional Fracture of mandible. 5. Communited fracture. 6. Patients who are not fit to undergo procedure under general anaesthesia. 7. Previous history of irradiation of head and neck area.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
primary outcome is to evaluate Occlusal Discrepancy, Maximum interincisal Opening,Lateral Excursion,Protusive Movement, Bite Force(Gnathodynamometer)ClinicallyTimepoint: 6 Months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
secondary outcome is to evaluate Fracture stability,Measurement of Posterior Ramus Height on Orthopantamogram using Condylar morphology scale method (Vertical distance between the lowest point of the mandibular notch and the highest point of the mandibular condyle),Plate Fracture,Screw Loosening,Malunion,Delayed Union,Non Union radiographically and Pain (according to 10cm Visual Analogue Scale),Facial nerve function (House-Brackmann grading)and Infection ClinicallyTimepoint: 6 Months	—

Measure

Time frame

secondary outcome is to evaluate Fracture stability,Measurement of Posterior Ramus Height on Orthopantamogram using Condylar morphology scale method (Vertical distance between the lowest point of the mandibular notch and the highest point of the mandibular condyle),Plate Fracture,Screw Loosening,Malunion,Delayed Union,Non Union radiographically and Pain (according to 10cm Visual Analogue Scale),Facial nerve function (House-Brackmann grading)and Infection ClinicallyTimepoint: 6 Months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gaurav Singh

Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute Of Dental And Medical Sciences

gaurav.singh15@gmail.com9415086536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026