Skip to content

A STUDY TO COMPARE CONVENTIONAL CASTS AND DIGITALLY DEVELOPED MODELS OF MAXILLARY DEFECTS REQUIRING OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS

A STUDY TO COMPARE CONVENTIONAL CASTS AND DIGITALLY DEVELOPED MODELS OF MAXILLARY DEFECTS REQUIRING OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110586
Enrollment
25
Registered
2026-05-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C148- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of lip, oral cavity and pharynx

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional cast model: Maxillary defect models will be fabricated using conventional impression and cast pouring techniques for obturator prosthesis fabrication. Intervention2: Maxil

Sponsors

Bhagyashri Bawanthade
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Mouth opening of at least 20mm or above Browns Class 2 vertical and Class 1-4 horizontal defects Defect should be well-healed and stable (6 months post-surgery, or 12 months post-radiotherapy) Resected site should be free of infection pathology discharge or bleeding which might interfere with the physical or digital impression. Any condition which may preclude radiation exposure such as recent high radiation exposure or active cancer radiation treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any medical condition (e.g., metabolic or bone disorders) or medications (such as corticosteroid, immunosuppressants) that delay wound healing. 2. Neurological, neuromuscular, cognitive or psychiatric disorders that may affect the ability to swallow, speak or comply with impression procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy and dimensional stability of conventional cast and digitally developed maxillary defect models used for obturator prosthesis fabrication.Timepoint: Assessed at the time of model fabrication and completion of model analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of time efficiency & dimensional stability between conventional cast & digitally developed models.Evaluation of surface detail reproduction of conventional & digitally developed models.Timepoint: Evaluated during & after completion of model fabrication procedure.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhagyashri Bawanthade

Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George s Medical University

bhagyashribawanthade99@gmail.com09420816599

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026