Skip to content

Comparative Study between Direct Laryngoscopy versus Video Laryngoscopy Guided Endotracheal Intubation in elective surgeries under General Anesthesia

A Comparative Study between Direct Laryngoscopy versus Video Laryngoscopy Guided Endotracheal Intubation in elective surgeries under General Anesthesia - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110582
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-05-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Direct Laryngoscope: The study is divided into 2 groups of 60 patients each.Group D used Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation during GA. Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3

Sponsors

Dr Anshul Verma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients giving consent for the study 2. Patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia. 3. Both male and female with age between 18-60yrs 4. Patients belonging to ASA class I and II. 5. Patients belonging to MPS class I and II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient belonging to MPS class 3 and 4. 2. Patient belonging to ASA class 3 and 4 3. Patients with head and neck injury and any other head and neck anatomical deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the ease of visualization of glottis structures and endotracheal tube insertion timeTimepoint: Endotracheal tube insertion time (in seconds)will be calculated from introduction of assigned Laryngoscope blade into the mouth to the time of placement of ETT between the vocal cords

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare number of insertions attempts for successful intubation Timepoint: ;To compare hemodynamic response [heart rate, mean arterial pressure & SpO2] during intubation Timepoint: At baseline After induction of GA At intubation After 10 minutes of intubation;To compare occurrence of any adverse events (oral soft tissue trauma, tongue and teeth trauma etc.)during intubationTimepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ajay Kumar Sinha

Government Medical College Haldwani

sinhaak1961@gmail.com9897672301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026