Comparing the Effects of Three Different Invisible Tooth Moving Appliances on Tooth Roots and Surrounding Bone

Root Resorption and Dentoalveolar Changes Associated with Three Aesthetic Orthodontic Appliances: A CBCT Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/05/110578

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Lingual Orthodontic Appliance: Patients will be treated with lingual fixed orthodontic appliances following upper first premolar extractions. Alignment leveling and space closure will

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Maxillary anterior proclination with a treatment plan of upper 1st premolars extractions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pre-existing root resorption Endodontically treated teeth Periodontal bone loss at baseline

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To measure and compare changes in root length among the three appliance systems and whether the magnitude of root resorption differs among maxillary teethTimepoint: T0 before initiation of orthodontic treatment T1 After completion of active treatment	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess variations in alveolar bone height and thickness pre and post treatment among patients treated with Brava , clear aligners, and conventional lingual appliances using CBCTTimepoint: T0 before initiation of orthodontic treatment T1 After completion of active treatment	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Khushi Gupta

Manav Rachna Dental College

adityatalwar.sds@mrei.ac.in8108225424

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026