Skip to content

A Study to compare two methods of treating infected teeth in children

Evaluation of Clinical Outcome of Two Different Rotary Systems in Pediatric Endodontics - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110452
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Kedo SG blue and Neoendo Pedoflex NiTi Rotary Files: first working length will be determined ,then Biomechanical preparation will be done and obturation will be performed third Control

Sponsors

Suman
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: children aged 4 to 8 years with no medical history having vital or non vital primary mandibular second molars with deep carious lesions requiring endodontic treatment and minimum two third of root length remaining

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: children with systemic disease with aberrant pathological mobility, root resorption, peri radicular pathosis, pulpal floor perforation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
According to null hypothesis there will be no significant difference between Kedo SG and Neoendo Pedoflex Rotary files but there will be significant difference between Rotary files and hand files.Timepoint: 1 Year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shantanu R Choudhari

Government Dental College and Hospital Ahmedabad Gujarat India

shandent1@gmail.com07922682070

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026