which is better option Harmonic scalpel Vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy

A Randomised controlled trial to compare clinical outcome of conventional Hemorrhoidectomy versus harmonic scalpel assisted Hemorrhoidectomy - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/05/110430

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K918- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: Harmonic Scalpel Hemorrhoidectomy: Harmonic scalpel to be used instead of conventional electrocautery at the time of surgery of hemorrhoidectomy at the step of hemorrhoid pedicle dissec

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with grade III & IV hemorrhoids

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient with grade I & II hemorrhoids

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
urinary retention requiring catheter insertionTimepoint: urinary retention requiring catheter insertion, to be recorded on day 1 of surgery only	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
no urinary retention or retention reliving spontaneouslyTimepoint: no urinary retention, no need for catheterisation to be recorded on day 1 of surgery	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNavneet Damor

Dr.S.N.Medical college Jodhpur

vermavijay71@yahoo.com7023514945

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026