A comparison of fit of dental implant crowns when made using PEEK scan bodies versus titanium scan bodies

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Implant Crowns Fabricated with PEEK Scan Body versus Titanium Scan Body: An Ex-vivo Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/05/110343

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: PEEK: Placement of PEEK scan body on abutment of implant and scanning it with intraoral scanner. Then fabrication of milled implant crown and with silicone replica technique marginal fi

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 65 years Healthy peri-implant tissues Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Uncontrolled systemic diseases Active peri-implantitis or periodontal disease Heavy smokers or parafunctional habits

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the marginal fit of implant crowns fabricated with PEEK scan body versus the Titanium scan body. Timepoint: At the time of insertion	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhuyar Sahil Rajesh

Manav rachna dental college

sahilbhuyar@gmail.com9067113251

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026