FindTrial
Sign In

Study Comparing Neuroendoscopic Surgery and Burr Hole Surgery in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma to Assess Recovery and Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Versus Burr Hole Craniostomy For Chronic Subdural Hematoma : A Randomized Controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110253
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-05-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Neuroendoscopic evacuation: Patients randomised to this arm will undergo evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma using a neuroendoscopic technique. A small craniostomy will be performe

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 All patient of chronic subdural hematoma selected for surgery in department of trauma surgery and critical care AIIMS Patna. 2 Those who give consent for the surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patient with recurrent chronic SDH. 2 Those who did not give consent for the study. 3 Acute on chronic SDH or significant coagulopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Brain parenchymal re-expansion following evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Extent of brain re-expansion assessed radiologically (CT scan).Timepoint: On post-op day 1 On post-op day 3 At 1 month follow up—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of hospital stay.Timepoint: At discharge;Neurological functional outcome.Timepoint: At discharge At 1 month follow up—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Himanshu kumar

AIIMS Patna

dranuragguddu@gmail.com83402671149

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026