Skip to content

Which Works Better for Chronic Low Back Pain: Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization or matrix machine Therapy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Matrix Rhythm Therapy in Individuals with chronic Low Back Pain- A Randomized Controlled Trial - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110156
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M999- Biomechanical lesion, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Matrix rhythm therapy and IASTM: Instrument-Assisted soft tissue mobilization and Matrix rhythm therapy Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Ajmalsha P V
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants are both genders of age ranges between 18 and 60 years Participants having CLBP persisting for at least 1 2 weeks (3 months) Participants having CLBP with no radiculopathy and red flags

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants who have Previous or scheduled surgery. Participants with infectious or systemic disorders and psychological disorders Participants with lumbar compression fractures, spondylolisthesis, Nerve root compromise, and malignancies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Numerical pain rating scaleTimepoint: Numerical pain rating scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Oswestry Disability IndexTimepoint: ;Back Performance Scale (BPS)Timepoint: ;Modified-modified Schober Test (MMST)Timepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAjmalsha P V

Yenepoya Physiotherapy college

ajmalsha.8817@gmail.com7306403177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026