Skip to content

Latarjet vs Iliac Crest Bone Graft: Which Surgery Better Prevents Shoulder Dislocation?

Latarjet procedures vs free iliac crest bone graft transfer for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: a prospective randomized trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/05/110111
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M898- Other specified disorders of bone

Interventions

Intervention1: free iliac crest bone graft transfer for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: Patients will be assigned to receive either an open Latarjet procedure or an

Sponsors

no any sponser for this trail
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Anterior shoulder instability with recurrent dislocations 2. Glenoid bone loss affecting at least 15% of the glenoid articular surface measured with the Pico method6 on 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans. 3. Consenting to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Concomitant shoulder pathologies (eg, cuff tears, nerve lesions, and osteoarthritis 2. History of previous surgical procedures on the affected shoulder except for open or arthroscopic Bankart repair 3. Neuromuscular pathologies including seizure disorders 4. History of infection 5. compliance problems (eg, alcohol or drug abuse) 6. Non consenting for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
funactional and radiological outcome assessment done on each fllowup visitTimepoint: funactional and radiological outcome assessment done on each fllowup visit at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Compare functional and radiological outcomes between the Latarjet and free iliac crest bone graft procedures in patients of shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss 2. Assess donor-site morbidity, graft resorption, and complication rates between the two techniques Timepoint: at followup of 6 month, 12 month and 24 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nitish Kumar

AIIMS, Gorakhpur, U.P

nitishaiims@gmail.com919718533472

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026