Skip to content

A study to check effect of 5 percent Minoxidil with biomimetic peptide hair solution for hair loss

A Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Biomimetic Peptide Augmented 5 Percent Minoxidil Topical Formulation in Individuals with Pattern Hair Loss. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/109825
Enrollment
45
Registered
2026-04-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L649- Androgenic alopecia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Biomimetic Peptide Concentration 1 + 5 percent Minoxidil: To evaluate efficacy of Biomimetic Peptide Concentration 1 + 5 percent Minoxidil Total duration of the study 5 Months Interven

Sponsors

Dr Debraj Shome
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinical diagnosis of pattern hair loss. 2. Hamilton-Norwood grade II, III (males), Ludwig s grades I (females). 3. Presence of an obvious visible thinning area suitable for target-area assessment. 4. Willingness to avoid starting any new hair-growth treatment during the study period. 5. Ability to comply with scheduled visits, photography, and daily application instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Scarring alopecia 2. Alopecia areata or other non-pattern hair loss 3. Active scalp disease (infection, psoriasis, dermatitis) 4. Prior hair transplant in target area 5. Recent treatments: Minoxidil within 4 weeks; Finasteride/Dutasteride within 3 months; PRP/exosomes/microneedling within 3 months 6. Pregnancy / lactation 7. Uncontrolled systemic illness 8. Known hypersensitivity 9. Participation in another clinical study within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the change in hair fall from baseline to Week 12 using the Hair Pull Test, measured by the number of hairs extracted per pull from the same scalp region using a standardized technique.Timepoint: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess improvement in scalp hair appearance from baseline to Week 12 using standardized global photographs evaluated by blinded independent assessors on a 7 point Global Photographic Assessment scale.Timepoint: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12;To assess participant perceived reduction in hair fall using a Subject Self Assessment Questionnaire scored on a 5 point scale ranging from much worse to much improved.Timepoint: Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12;To assess participant perceived improvement in hair density using a Subject Self Assessment Questionnaire scored on a 5 point scale ranging from much worse to much improved.Timepoint: Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12;To assess participant perceived improvement in hair thickness using a Subject Self Assessment Questionnaire scored on a 5 point scale ranging from much worse to much improved.Timepoint: Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12;To document visible changes in the target scalp area using standardized photography at predefined study visits.Timepoint: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12;To evaluate safety and tolerability by recording local scalp reactions including erythema, dryness, scaling, burning or stinging, itching, and any other adverse events.Timepoint: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMs Kartiki Wani

The Esthetic Clinics (TEC )

varad.saptarshi@theestheticclinics.com9136673922

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026