FindTrial
Sign In

MTA vs. Biodentine: Which Works Better at Protecting the Tooth s Nerve in Painful Back Teeth After a Dentist Cleans Only Part of the Decay.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of mta and biodentine for indirect pulp capping after selective caires removal in symptomatic molars having reversible pulpitis - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/109320
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K023- Arrested dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

Dr Ninad Gharde
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 19 and 40 years molars diagnosed with deep dental caries without pulpal exposure pulpal response on diagnostic tests should be with adjunct to healthy tooth or pulp in reversible pulpitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the clinical efficacy of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine as indirect pulp capping materials following selective caries removal in symptomatic permanent molars diagnosed with reversible pulpitis.Timepoint: Outcome will be assessed after 1 week, 1 month, 3 month and 6 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ninad Gharde

Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital

shivmantri24@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026