Light cure MTA vs. Putty MTA used in pulp capping

An in vivo clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with Light Cure MTA vs. Putty MTA: A 6 months follow-up study - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/04/109069

Enrollment

Registered

2026-04-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K023- Arrested dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: Light cure MTA: The intervention group will receive light-cure mineral trioxide aggregate (Light-Cure MTA) as an indirect pulp capping material. After caries removal, a thin layer of Li

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Deep caries lesion Symptomatic Reversible pulpitis Absence of fistula, swelling, tender on percussion Vital response of tooth to thermal and electric pulp testing No periapical pathology or resorption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Sharp, penetrating pain and spontaneous night pain Tooth mobility and discoloration Pulp exposure, periapical radiolucency, or root resorption

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical outcomes include pain, tenderness, mobility, response to vitality test, sinus tract Timepoint: 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Radiographic outcomes include PDL widening, apical radiolucency, obliteration of pulp chamber or secondary caries, external and internal resoption, reparative dentin thicknessTimepoint: 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Dinesh Rao

Pacific Dental College And Hospital Debari

pedodinesh2003@yahoo.co.in7340659914

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026