FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of C-MAC D BLADE and TASCOPE videolaryngoscope with respect to ease of intubation and learning curve for an inexperienced anesthetist

Comparison of two videolaryngoscope and its efficiency to use for an inexperienced anesthetist - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108914
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Intervention2: GENERAL ANESTHESIA USING VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE: COMPARING TWO VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE D-BLADE AND TASCOPE UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA.DURATION OF BOTH PROCEDURES ARE REC

Sponsors

Sri narayani hospital and research centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PATIENT OF ALL SEXES, AGE BETWEEN 18 AND 70, ASA GRADE I, II, III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with upper airway anomalies Facialtrauma and full stomach History of difficult Intubation Head and neck tumor Cervical spine pathologies Patient refusal for the procedure Patient with anticipated difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Our primary objective of the study is to compare the time for successful intubation and ease of intubation by an inexperienced anesthetist using C-MAC D BLADE and TAScope in patients coming for general anesthesia.Timepoint: 6 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jagadeesh

Sri narayani hospital and research centre

b_s_krishnan@hotmail.com6380546634

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026