FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia Using Two Different Techniques Middle And Side Approach

Incidence Of Backache Following Subarachnoid Block Comparing Median And Paramedian Approach - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108799
Enrollment
168
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

K S Hegde Medical Academy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Undergoing Subarachnoid block using 25G Quincke-Babcock Needle ASA PS I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of chronic backache Patients with traumatic deformity of spine or congenital abnormality of lumbar spine Conversion of spinal to general anesthesia intraoperatively Patients continuously on analgesics postoperatively

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the incidence of post spinal backache in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia using median and paramedian techniqueTimepoint: At 24hours 1 week 1month 2 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To observe & assess the severity & duration of backache associated with median & paramedian spinal anaesthesia techniqueTimepoint: At 24 hours 1week 1month 2 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nisarga N

K S Hegde Medical Academy

shetty.anil10@gmail.com9448012303

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026