FindTrial
Sign In

Which Treatment Works Better for Ankle Sprain In Athletes Laser Therapy Or Ultrasound Therapy With Manual Treatment

Effect Of Low-Level Laser Therapy With Mulligan s Mobilization Versus Ultrasound Therapy With Mulligan s Mobilization On Acute Ankle Sprain In Athletes - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108767
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Low Lever Laser Therapy With Mulligan Mobilization: repeated for 3to5 sets of 6to10 repetitions per session for 7 days Control Intervention1: Ultrasound Therapy With Mulligans Mobilizat

Sponsors

Malla Reddy University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Both Male And Females,Patients Between 18-38 Years Of Age,Medically Diagnosed With An Ankle Sprain,Patient With Grade 1 Acute Ankle Sprain By Using Special Test Anterior Drawer Test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any recent fracture to the lower limb in the past months,Patient not willing to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS Visual analogus scale To assess pain,Range of motion goniometer,Foot and ankle ability measure FAAM Timepoint: 7 days—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Raghuvamshi Pogula

MALLA REDDY UNIVERSITY

raghuvamshir@mallareddyuniversity.ac.in8501030667

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026