FindTrial
Sign In

Trial Comparing the Efficiency of total Maxillary Arch Distalization Using Passive Self-Ligating Brackets Versus Conventional MBT Brackets in Adults

Efficiency of en masse maxillary arch distalization with passive self ligation v/s conventional MBT brackets in adults : a randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108760
Enrollment
18
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Selfy passive self ligation brackets: Compare with conventional MBT brackets for en masse maxillary arch distalization Control Intervention1: conventional MBT brackets: compare for effi

Sponsors

DR Fathimma Marjanath
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in the age group 18 25 years Patients with Angle s Class II malocclusion with end on end molar and end on end canine relation bilaterally, with minimal upper and lower anterior crowding. Patients with pleasing profile indicated for maxillary arch distalization Patients with average growth pattern Good patient compliance during the treatment with good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients in the age group 18 25 years Patients with Angle s Class II malocclusion with end on end molar and end on end canine relation bilaterally, with minimal upper and lower anterior crowding. Patients with pleasing profile indicated for maxillary arch distalization Patients with average growth pattern Good patient compliance during the treatment with good oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
time taken from end on end molar relation to achieve class I molar relation bilaterallyTimepoint: t1 and t2—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Inter-canine & inter-molar width At T0 T1 T3 & T4 to analyse arch expansion.Timepoint: At T0 T1 T3 & T4;cephalometric assessment is carried out at the beginning of treatment and after completion of treatment to determine & compare the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in both groups.Timepoint: T0 and T4—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDRFATHIMMA MARJANATH

GDC calicut

marjanasuhail98@gmail.com8921818452

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026