Skip to content

Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound guided vs conventional method of caudal block in paediatric patient.

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Real Time Ultrasound (USG) Guided Vs Conventional Landmark Technique for Pediatrics Caudal Block - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108759
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Intervention2: Ultrasound Guided versus Conventional landmark technique of caudal block.: Comparison of Time taken and Number of attempt to perform block in USG vs Conventional

Sponsors

DY Patil University School of Medicine and Hospital Nerul Navi Mumbai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients belonging to the age group of 1 to 9 Yrs. 2.ASA grade I, II . 3.Patients of either sex. 4.Patients without any co-morbidities or Congenital Anomalies. 5.Patient undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with Infection at the injection site. 2.Patients with severe coagulopathy . 3.Patients with allergy to local anaesthetic drugs .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare Time taken to perform the block and Number of Attempts to Perform the Block at baseline.Timepoint: To Compare Time taken to perform the block and Number of Attempts to Perform the Block at baseline .

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Asses the effect of Caudal Block on Haemodynamic Parameters Intraoperatively at baseline. Timepoint: At Baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rochana Bakhshi

DY Patil School of Medicine , Navi Mumbai

drrochana@yahoo.com9323272151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026