FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Tooth Movement Speed Using Conventional Method and Minor Bone Surgery (Corticotomy) During Braces Treatment

Comparison of Canine Retraction by Conventional and Corticotomy-Assisted Methods: A Randomized Split Mouth Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108712
Enrollment
14
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: corticotomy assited orthodontics: Corticotomy-assisted orthodontic canine retraction will be performed using fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Selective alveolar corticotomy will be

Sponsors

Institute of dental sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Minimum age of 15 years at the start of treatment. Indication for bilateral upper first premolar extraction. Presence of full permanent dentition up to second molars.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of systemic disease affecting bone metabolism. Presence of periodontal disease, bone loss, or poor oral hygiene Smoking habit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of canine retractionTimepoint: Before and after 4 months of canine retraction starts—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Root resorptionTimepoint: Before and after 4 months of canine retraction starts—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRavi Bhandari

Institute of Dental Sciences

surajnikam9696@gmail.com7758888699

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026