Comparing two devices used to correct forward teeth and jaw alignment problems.

Comparative evaluation of effects of Sharmas class II corrector and Powerscope appliance in patients with Angles class II div 1 malocclusion - A randomized clinical trial - NIl

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/04/108622

Enrollment

Registered

2026-04-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Powerscope: Powerscope will be provided to cases of Angles Class II div 1 malocclusion for mandibular advancement and study duration will be of 6 months. Control Intervention1: Sharmas

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion with a normal maxilla and retrognathic mandible. 2. Class II molar relation. 3. Overjet equal to or greater than 4mm. 4. Patient with permanent dentition within the age group of 13 to 20 years for fixed functional group 5. No history of orthodontic treatment. 6. Positive VTO on clinical evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with class I and class III malocclusion. 2. No craniofacial syndromes or systemic disease. 3. Mild crowding and proclination in the dental arches.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
When using Sharma s Class II Bite Corrector, clinicians can expect significantly less lower incisor inclination compared to treatment with the Powerscope appliance. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes are anticipated, including a wider and more natural range of mandibular movement with unrestricted mouth opening. The appliance also allows quick and easy chairside fabrication, promotes better patient compliance, and offers greater cost effectivenessTimepoint: Assessment will be done at 1 month. Overall assessment will be done at 6 months. incisor inclination compared to treatment with the Powerscope appliance. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes are anticipated, including a wider and more natural range of mandibular movement with unrestricted mouth opening. The appliance also allows quick and easy chairside fabrication, promotes better patient compliance, and offers greater cost effectiveness	—

Measure

Time frame

When using Sharma s Class II Bite Corrector, clinicians can expect significantly less lower incisor inclination compared to treatment with the Powerscope appliance. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes are anticipated, including a wider and more natural range of mandibular movement with unrestricted mouth opening. The appliance also allows quick and easy chairside fabrication, promotes better patient compliance, and offers greater cost effectivenessTimepoint: Assessment will be done at 1 month. Overall assessment will be done at 6 months. incisor inclination compared to treatment with the Powerscope appliance. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes are anticipated, including a wider and more natural range of mandibular movement with unrestricted mouth opening. The appliance also allows quick and easy chairside fabrication, promotes better patient compliance, and offers greater cost effectiveness

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ranjit Kamble

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

ranjitkamble2506@gmail.com9822231975

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026